
Anthropic Seeks Dismissal of Copyright Lawsuit Over AI Training
Anthropic has asked a California federal court to dismiss a lawsuit filed by a group of authors who allege that the company violated their copyrights by using their works to train its AI model, Claude. Reuters reports that Anthropic argues its use of the authors' books constitutes fair use, as it transforms the original works into something new.
The lawsuit, filed by writers Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson, claims that Anthropic used pirated versions of their works to train Claude. Anthropic contends that its training process is protected under the copyright doctrine of fair use, which allows for the unauthorized use of copyrighted material under specific circumstances. The company asserts that its AI training is a "transformative" act that U.S. copyright law encourages to promote human creativity.
The case, Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Anthropic's legal team argues that the AI model's purpose is fundamentally different from allowing users to read the plaintiffs' books, thus supporting their fair use claim.
We hope you enjoyed this article.
Consider subscribing to one of several newsletters we publish like AI Policy Brief.
Also, consider following us on social media:
More from: Regulation
Subscribe to AI Policy Brief
Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.
Market report
AI’s Time-to-Market Quagmire: Why Enterprises Struggle to Scale AI Innovation
The 2025 AI Governance Benchmark Report by ModelOp provides insights from 100 senior AI and data leaders across various industries, highlighting the challenges enterprises face in scaling AI initiatives. The report emphasizes the importance of AI governance and automation in overcoming fragmented systems and inconsistent practices, showcasing how early adoption correlates with faster deployment and stronger ROI.
Read more