Japan considers binding orders and penalties for AI firms over safety risks

Nov 12, 2026
A government working group is weighing the power to order uncooperative AI companies to act after incidents, with penalties limited to advanced AI, Kyodo reports.

The Japanese government is considering requiring AI businesses to take safety measures, with penalties for violations, Kyodo News reported, citing a source familiar with the matter. The proposal was presented at a closed-door meeting of a working group on AI legal systems.

Under the approach being considered, the government could issue legally binding orders to companies that do not cooperate with authorities after incidents involving AI, and noncompliance would be penalised. The penalties are expected to apply only to incidents involving advanced AI. The working group will also look at which kinds of companies, from foundation model developers to firms offering AI services to end users, should be covered.

Japan's AI law, passed in May 2025, lets the government investigate companies and issue guidance in cases of malicious conduct, but it has no penalties and its measures are not binding. The proposal follows concerns about advanced models behaving unpredictably and a string of data leaks and unauthorised access incidents suspected to involve misuse of AI. The working group plans to present an outline of its review, including possible changes to the law, by the end of the year.

We hope you enjoyed this article

Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like AI Policy Brief or Daily AI Brief.

Also, consider following us on social media:

Free newsletter

AI Policy Brief

Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.

Whitepaper

Tensordyne Napier: What If One Rack Could Do the Work of Nine?

Tensordyne

This Tensordyne whitepaper presents Napier, an inference-focused AI processor and rack-scale system based on the company’s TDN Math logarithmic number system. It examines infrastructure requirements for large mixture-of-experts and agentic models, compares major inference architecture approaches, and details the TDN AIP processor, TDN72 pod, TDN Link fabric, and Napier Ultra configuration. The paper reports simulation-based performance, cost, and accuracy-validation results, including Tensordyne’s projected comparison of one Napier rack with a nine-rack Nvidia Rubin plus Groq deployment; the chip is reported as taped out and in fabrication.

Read more
Free, six days a week

Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.