Japan considers binding orders and penalties for AI firms over safety risks
The Japanese government is considering requiring AI businesses to take safety measures, with penalties for violations, Kyodo News reported, citing a source familiar with the matter. The proposal was presented at a closed-door meeting of a working group on AI legal systems.
Under the approach being considered, the government could issue legally binding orders to companies that do not cooperate with authorities after incidents involving AI, and noncompliance would be penalised. The penalties are expected to apply only to incidents involving advanced AI. The working group will also look at which kinds of companies, from foundation model developers to firms offering AI services to end users, should be covered.
Japan's AI law, passed in May 2025, lets the government investigate companies and issue guidance in cases of malicious conduct, but it has no penalties and its measures are not binding. The proposal follows concerns about advanced models behaving unpredictably and a string of data leaks and unauthorised access incidents suspected to involve misuse of AI. The working group plans to present an outline of its review, including possible changes to the law, by the end of the year.
We hope you enjoyed this article
Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like AI Policy Brief or Daily AI Brief.
Also, consider following us on social media:
More from Regulation
Nov 12 Nonprofits sue Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and SpaceX to halt development of new AI models Nov 12 European Parliament Calls for AI Observatory and Non-Proliferation-Style AI Treaty Nov 12 EDPB Selects AI Recruitment for 2027 Enforcement Action Nov 12 Finland and Estonia Call for EU AI Incident Response System Nov 11 UK ICO Says AI Drafted Data Access Requests Remain ValidMore from AI Safety
Nov 12 Nonprofits sue Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and SpaceX to halt development of new AI models Nov 12 Leaked files show Russian propagandist used Claude and Qwen to churn out pro-Kremlin content Nov 12 European Parliament Calls for AI Observatory and Non-Proliferation-Style AI Treaty Nov 12 Anthropic finds AI agent teams perform worse than one coordinator Nov 12 Finland and Estonia Call for EU AI Incident Response SystemAI Policy Brief
Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.
Whitepaper
Tensordyne Napier: What If One Rack Could Do the Work of Nine?
Tensordyne
This Tensordyne whitepaper presents Napier, an inference-focused AI processor and rack-scale system based on the company’s TDN Math logarithmic number system. It examines infrastructure requirements for large mixture-of-experts and agentic models, compares major inference architecture approaches, and details the TDN AIP processor, TDN72 pod, TDN Link fabric, and Napier Ultra configuration. The paper reports simulation-based performance, cost, and accuracy-validation results, including Tensordyne’s projected comparison of one Napier rack with a nine-rack Nvidia Rubin plus Groq deployment; the chip is reported as taped out and in fabrication.
Read moreYou may also like
Australia to legislate mandatory safety rules and a regulator for frontier AI after OpenAI Medicare breach
UK seeks powers to investigate AI agent control failures
Massachusetts weighs strictest US AI safety law with independent model tests
Finland and Norway convene 31 countries on frontier AI safety
OpenAI backs Singapore call for AI incident reporting rules
Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.