Massachusetts weighs strictest US AI safety law with independent model tests

Oct 20, 2026
A Massachusetts bill would have independent evaluators test large AI developers' models for catastrophic risk at least three times a year. Anthropic endorses it.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts may pass one of the strictest state AI safety laws in the US, MassLive columnist Scott Kirsner reported in a piece republished by Government Technology. Governor Maura Healey asked legislators to add AI safety and transparency language to the Mass Wins economic development bill, which is still being negotiated.

The proposal would have independent evaluators test the core models of large AI developers for catastrophic risk at least three times a year, with the companies paying for the evaluations. It would cover developers with more than $500 million in annual revenue that use massive computing power to train their systems. California, Illinois and New York already require frontier developers to publish safety plans and report serious incidents, but none lets outsiders test the models directly.

Penalties would reach up to $1 million for a first violation and up to $3 million for later ones. State Sen. Barry Finegold, who chairs the economic development committee, said the evaluator provision was still being discussed.

Anthropic endorsed the bill, and OpenAI said it supports independent evaluations. Google, Anthropic, OpenAI and Meta are lobbying the Legislature, according to Finegold.

We hope you enjoyed this article

Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like AI Policy Brief or Daily AI Brief.

Also, consider following us on social media:

Free newsletter

AI Policy Brief

Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.

Whitepaper

Tensordyne Napier: What If One Rack Could Do the Work of Nine?

Tensordyne

This Tensordyne whitepaper presents Napier, an inference-focused AI processor and rack-scale system based on the company’s TDN Math logarithmic number system. It examines infrastructure requirements for large mixture-of-experts and agentic models, compares major inference architecture approaches, and details the TDN AIP processor, TDN72 pod, TDN Link fabric, and Napier Ultra configuration. The paper reports simulation-based performance, cost, and accuracy-validation results, including Tensordyne’s projected comparison of one Napier rack with a nine-rack Nvidia Rubin plus Groq deployment; the chip is reported as taped out and in fabrication.

Read more
Free, six days a week

Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.