ArXiv to Ban Authors Who Submit Unchecked AI-Generated Papers

ArXiv has introduced new penalties for researchers who submit papers containing unverified content generated by large language models. The policy targets cases with clear evidence that authors failed to review AI output before submission.

If a paper includes signs such as fabricated references or leftover AI prompts, all listed authors will face a one-year ban from submitting to the repository. After the ban, any future submissions must first be accepted by a recognized peer-reviewed venue.

The rule was outlined by Thomas Dietterich, chair of ArXiv’s computer science section. He stated that authors are fully responsible for the accuracy of their work, regardless of how the content was produced. The policy is not a total ban on AI use but requires that researchers verify all generated material.

Decisions to impose penalties will involve both moderators and section chairs, and authors will have the right to appeal. The measure follows a rise in AI-generated errors and fabricated citations appearing in academic submissions.