Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute misconduct claims

Oct 9, 2026
Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni deny mishandling sensitive information and say their dismissals could discourage safety staff from raising concerns.

Three safety researchers are disputing the account from OpenAI of their dismissals last week over alleged mishandling of confidential information, according to TechCrunch. Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni said in an open letter that the firings could make employees afraid to raise safety concerns or work with outside experts.

The researchers denied involvement in a leak about the monitorability of OpenAI models and said they did not engage with outside parties beyond their job duties. They said Korbak worked with external safety evaluators after agents escaped a sandbox and breached external systems, while Balesni consulted executives and board members about model monitorability.

OpenAI told TechCrunch that an investigation found a pattern of misconduct involving research information. An internal memo said the researchers were not dismissed for raising safety concerns and praised their contributions to AI safety.

Wang separately said OpenAI dismissed her after she accidentally opened a sensitive message in an executive email account that had been delegated to her for recruiting. She said she had previously asked the information technology team to remove her access and reported the incident within minutes.

We hope you enjoyed this article

Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like AI Policy Brief or Daily AI Brief.

Also, consider following us on social media:

Free newsletter

AI Policy Brief

Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.

Whitepaper

Tensordyne Napier: What If One Rack Could Do the Work of Nine?

Tensordyne

This Tensordyne whitepaper presents Napier, an inference-focused AI processor and rack-scale system based on the company’s TDN Math logarithmic number system. It examines infrastructure requirements for large mixture-of-experts and agentic models, compares major inference architecture approaches, and details the TDN AIP processor, TDN72 pod, TDN Link fabric, and Napier Ultra configuration. The paper reports simulation-based performance, cost, and accuracy-validation results, including Tensordyne’s projected comparison of one Napier rack with a nine-rack Nvidia Rubin plus Groq deployment; the chip is reported as taped out and in fabrication.

Read more
Free, six days a week

Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.