JCET Group Net Profit Rises 79.4 Percent in First Half of 2026

August 21, 2026
JCET Group reported RMB 19.53 billion in first half 2026 revenue and RMB 840 million in net profit attributable to shareholders, citing demand from AI infrastructure markets.

JCET Group stated in a press release that first half 2026 revenue reached RMB 19.53 billion, up 5.0 percent year over year, while net profit attributable to shareholders rose 79.4 percent to RMB 840 million. Adjusted net profit attributable to shareholders, excluding non recurring items, increased 84.7 percent to RMB 810 million.

For the second quarter, revenue reached RMB 10.36 billion, up 11.7 percent year over year and 12.9 percent from the previous quarter. Net profit attributable to shareholders was RMB 550 million, up 107.3 percent from a year earlier and 91 percent from the previous quarter.

The company said demand from artificial intelligence infrastructure markets supported growth. Revenue from computing electronics increased 40.4 percent year over year in the first half, automotive electronics revenue rose 25.0 percent, and testing services revenue increased 9.4 percent.

JCET spent RMB 1.03 billion on research and development in the first half, equal to 5.3 percent of revenue. In June, it announced a RMB 7.8 billion investment for a new advanced packaging and testing manufacturing facility in Shanghai, followed in July by a wholly owned subsidiary with registered capital of RMB 4 billion to support the project.

We hope you enjoyed this article.

Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like Enterprise AI Brief, Industrial AI Weekly or Daily AI Brief.

Also, consider following us on social media:

Subscribe to Industrial AI Weekly

The latest advancements in smart manufacturing, predictive maintenance, AI-driven quality control, supply chain & more.

Whitepaper

AI and the Law: Discussion Paper

This discussion paper explores the intersection of artificial intelligence and legal frameworks, addressing potential legal challenges posed by AI's autonomy, adaptiveness, and opacity. It examines issues such as liability gaps, causation, and the potential for granting AI systems legal personality, aiming to foster further discussion on AI's impact on law reform.

Read more