BRG Survey Finds Construction AI Spending Rarely Cuts Staff

Oct 14, 2026
A BRG survey finds that 68% of construction and development organizations spent at least $250,000 on AI over two years, while only 11% reduced staff because of the technology.

BRG said in a press release that 68% of surveyed construction and development organizations spent at least $250,000 on AI over the past two years, while 37% spent at least $1 million. The firm surveyed more than 100 industry executives in July 2026, with most respondents based in North America.

Only 11% reported cutting staff because of AI, while 18% added staff in some areas. More than half changed their use of outside vendors, consultants or contractors, 46% changed team structures and collaboration, and 38% retrained existing employees.

Planning and feasibility was the most common use, cited by 58% of respondents and 80% of builders. AI was also used during construction by 49%, before construction by 46%, in business operations by 43%, and after construction by 40%. Only 15% said AI was fully integrated across projects and operations.

Respondents reported double digit cost savings across several functions, but used different measures to assess returns. Financial metrics were the main measure for 37%, operational measures for 29%, and usage or adoption measures for about one quarter. Another 6% did not evaluate return on investment.

BRG is an advisory firm offering economics, disputes, corporate finance and performance improvement services. The figures are self reported by survey respondents.

We hope you enjoyed this article

Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like Daily AI Brief.

Also, consider following us on social media:

Free newsletter

Daily AI Brief

Daily report covering major AI developments and industry news, with both top stories and complete market updates

Whitepaper

Tensordyne Napier: What If One Rack Could Do the Work of Nine?

Tensordyne

This Tensordyne whitepaper presents Napier, an inference-focused AI processor and rack-scale system based on the company’s TDN Math logarithmic number system. It examines infrastructure requirements for large mixture-of-experts and agentic models, compares major inference architecture approaches, and details the TDN AIP processor, TDN72 pod, TDN Link fabric, and Napier Ultra configuration. The paper reports simulation-based performance, cost, and accuracy-validation results, including Tensordyne’s projected comparison of one Napier rack with a nine-rack Nvidia Rubin plus Groq deployment; the chip is reported as taped out and in fabrication.

Read more

You may also like

Free, six days a week

Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.